The number of pages within the document is: 16
The self-declared author(s) is/are:
Maine Supreme Judicial Court
The subject is as follows:
Original authors did not specify.
The original URL is: LINK
The access date was:
2019-02-19 10:28:01.399610
Please be aware that this may be under copyright restrictions. Please send an email to admin@pharmacoengineering.com for any AI-generated issues.
The content is as follows:
MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 2013 ME 108 Docket: Yor -13-46 Argued : October 9 , 2013 Decided: December 1 0, 2013 Panel: SAUFLEY, C.J., and ALEXANDER , LEVY, SILVER, MEAD, GORMAN , and JABAR, JJ. TIMOTHY BELL, BY HIS PARENT AND NEXT FRIEND, TERESA BELL v. RANDALL DAWSON et al. ALEXANDER, J. [¦1] This appeal c omes to us following an incident in which then -thirteen -year -old Timothy Bell was seriously injured when he skateboarded out of Randall and Rose Dawson Õs driveway and was struck on the roadway by a moving vehicle . Teresa Bell, on behalf of her son , Timothy, appeals from a summary judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J. ) in favor of the Dawsons on BellÕs claims that TimothyÕs injuries wer e caused by the DawsonsÕ negligent supervision and by the DawsonsÕ negligently creating or allowing what Bell characterizes as dangerous topographical condition s, specifically vegetation growth, on their property. [¦2 ] Bell argues that the Superior C ourt erred when it determined , with respect to the negligent supervision claim, that the Dawsons owed no duty of care to Timothy because Timothy was not in a custodial relationship with the Dawsons
Please note all content on this page was automatically generated via our AI-based algorithm (XCg9tw6OKLNFq0MKeNfH). Please let us know if you find any errors.